Scatological Sensibilities

An ecosystem is a basically a poop-cycle. A blog by @ultimape

So long and thanks for all the Tweets?

This is an essay explaining my position and reasoning behind moving away from #Twitter.

If you simply want to know about what I'll be doing moving forward: I made a separate blog post detailing specifics for handling my content, how to keep up with what I'm doing, and and where I hope to go from here.

I will also be emailing that out to people who have reached out to me on Twitter.

About this blog

Having a place to call home on the net is the first step toward freeing myself up from centralized services. This is why I bought this WovenSoup domain and created this subdomain to host a blog.

I'm hosting this blog via Write.As. You can subscribe to it as a letter via email (subscription box should be down at the very bottom of the homepage).

You can also follow it via most popular ActivityPub capable accounts. It is currently sharing under the handle “@ultimape@scat.wovensoup.com” It should be as simple as typing the URL https://scat.wovensoup.com/ into your client's search.

That's right! With ActivityPub, you can host your social media account alongside a blogging platform and have someone follow both! As someone who is more comfortable with social media than with email, the flexibility of potentially following my favorite blogs via the Fediverse is awesome. Having social sharing built into the platform here is a really nice feature.

I've been using this platform for a few years now to host the occasional bit of writing. I highly recommend write.as if you want a simple blogging platform with none of the needy garbage that sites like Medium push your readers into. I actually like it enough that I bought a pro plan on their hosted service for my website here. I did this because I feel confident in being able to migrate to write freely in the future and don't feel locked into their service.

I want to support the developers who are building out these decentralized tools. @matt@writing.exchange has been building out something special and am looking forward to seeing this platform grow (along with the ActivityPub/Fediverse ecosystem as a whole!) in the future.

So long Twitter, but not forgotten.

I have long since lost trust in Twitter as a platform. I wanted to think that the direction they were heading would be a good one, but recent doings have ruffled my feathers enough that I have decided to just leave.

I was hoping that Musk might come in and fix some of the cruft that has been building up over the years. Many of his decrees up until now seemed good from a strategy perspective. Fixing some of the distortions caused by the algorithmic timeline and making the platform more sustainable so it can be more selective about how it gets it funding are both noble goals to work toward. Overall I am very impressed so far.

But these last few weeks has been uneasy time to experience as heavy Twitter user.

Over the years I've been slowly working my way into being able to remove my twitter content (external brain, really) from that platform. I've had a couple of false starts and my health has made it a challenge to get things together.

For example, I've been keeping an export of my tweets available on keybase.pub, in case I get banned for some reason like so many of my friends have. I've also have been slowly building up the foundations of a “Digital Garden” to house my firehose of content as a companion to my research repository I've been keeping on are.na. And a number of my core twitter clades have been chatting in discord and slack for a few years now.

The only reason this hasn't been a focus of mine is due to my GF's health issues over the past year, and the Grant to work on Project Viril taking up the rest of my time. Getting kicked out of our lab space on short notice wasn't really helpful either. I have been up to my nose with trying to keep my life going. Working meaningfully on things that aren't tied to these concerns has been hard.

But I have to escape Twitter before It's too late. The massive shake up and chaos on Twitter is an existential risk to the network of people and ideas I have built up and encoded into my web there. I need to just rip the proverbial Band-Aid off and commit to migrating my external memory to another platform entirely.

I can't handle this chaos and I don't want to be on an unstable platform who would choose to enact a rule that limits me over something as simple as saying “follow me on mastodon”.

I do have a mastodon account, however it is not anywhere as useful as my current Twitter and I am not happy with it's current location. So if you do wanna follow me on the Fediverse, I recommend following this blog first as discussed above. I will be figuring out how to host my own single-user instance here on WovenSoup, likely using Pleroma or another lightweight service.

Policy Grind

I was prepared for some 'dumb' stuff to happen under Musk's management, but what's happen right now isn't just dumb, it feels actively malicious. Even if it wasn't, I am worried enough about that I don't wanna deal with it anymore.

I could forgive wanting to delete old accounts to help avoid the heavy costs of hosting large swaths of twitter data. Deleting my long dead friends from twitter was something that had been threatened in the past and I had prepared for that emotional damage. Still annoying.

But the rest of this seems to stem from drama around a real-time dox'ing account.

One dox, two dox, red dox, blue dox.

I'm lowkey a fan of Musk, and hearing his kid got harassed was saddening to me. I care a lot about dox'ing. I am deeply against dox'ing behavior because I know how hurtful it can be to be wrongfully targeted. So watching this situation unfold has been upsetting.

One of the reasons I got so good at doing research stems directly from a time when my own house got dox'ed due to some script kiddy pulling shit like that against a Kickstarter campaign. Our house got put on a list because someone who used to live there was listed as a backer. It was scary AF to feel like we were going to get swatted or some other asinine behavior. So I don't blame Musk for wanting to enforce anti-dox'ing rules and I think it is about time that twitter has acted on content that was already in their policy.

However, the rapid change in Rules and Guidelines that lead to a blanket ban on content linking to a real-time dox'ing account was alarming. The resulting drama it has caused is tiresome and approaching asinine. From my perspective Musk effectively instigated a Streisand Effect in some weird crusade to stop people from looking at that dox'ing account? I'm not a fan of journalists having free reign in spreading what amounts to promoting a way to harass someone, but even I can see how the way that this was handled was ungraceful.

On top of all of that, the use of suspension as a heavy handed method of enforcing these (effectively new interpretations) of the rules was obnoxious. I can understand having tweets removed on an individual basis like how Kanye's offending tweets were removed (at least before he was banned again). I feel like using the suspension as a punishment is really shitty. It's punishing more than the person using the account, but everyone who follows them too. Combining all of this with the rushed nature of these changes and a sudden change in rules against the account? It was a recipe for a disaster.

Hairy Elephants

This situation was (and still is) quickly becoming out of control. Seeing Mastodon's joinmastodon account get suspended peaked my attention. Of course their tweets are back up thanks to pushback, but the tweet was removed with a notice (like it should have been the whole time).

That mastodon's biggest server “.social” supports a real-time dox'ing account has soured me against that particular host. I was already planning to move my account elsewhere on the fediverse simply because of it's size and wanting to self-host, but seeing that account be promoted has strengthened my resolve. For a platform that champions safety features, it was gross to see them promote content that had directly lead to someone being stalked. So really this whole situation has disgusted me.

It is very ironic because I had just finished reading a piece about how that space is focused on safety features.

“But what happens if hateful people do set up a server? Well, obviously, they don’t get promoted on our “Join Mastodon” website or in our app.” https://time.com/6229230/mastodon-eugen-rochko-interview/

But while I am saddened that the .social host has done this, I think the overall response from Twitter's end has been handled poorly.

The straw that broke me.

The last last straw for me deciding against my use of Twitter was the most recent changes to their policies. Specifically the addition of a draconian set of rules regarding “Promotion of alternative social platforms policy”. I originally saw this via @TwitterSupport's tweet. It has since been deleted.

TL;DR: The new rules said they won't let me link to my mastodon account?

I literally made my mastodon account so I wouldn't kill myself if twitter suspended me. Holding my network hostage is a direct threat to my well being. That it was even conceivable to do what they did has shaken my trust entirely.

I can't put up with this anymore. Every link that I have ever made to my other account on the Fediverse is now being flagged as unsafe and I am unable to link to my own content there? This ridiculous and clearly an over-reaction.

As I said in my final thread on twitter:

“I am directly hostile to a platform holding my social network hostage.”

So I must bid Twitter Adieu.

With friends being deleted, accounts being suspended left and right, and the chaos that is currently unfolding, I don't think my Memex is safe there any longer.

Twitter is a powerful thing and these changes have been wielded too carelessness. All of this doesn't give me a lot of confidence in future direction of Twitter here.

Twitter is more than a business. And while I believe one of the richest man in the world is more than qualified to run a business, that doesn't mean he's going to do a good job at managing the other part of twitter. And while I think move fast + break things is a good strategy when you're building out a fledgling startup and trying to nail the fundamentals, Twitter has long since moved past that phase as a company.

From where I'm standing, Twitter can also be thought as an organism. A hive mind made of the people who's lives have been intertwined with the platform. Damaging this community by moving fast and breaking things to improve the product in ways that make it more resilient is one thing. And taking steps that are a necessary evil to maintain the platform to house us and ensure it lives despite it's insane costs is a good idea. Some estimates suggest it's hemorrhaging 3 million dollars a day? at the time Musk took over? (That fact alone makes me think I better relocate before it's too late.)

But to directly attack the denizens by restricting them with asinine rules that amount to restricting our free association? This goes directly against the magic that makes Twitter so powerful. Doing that was unacceptable to me.

The organism can move on.


Sadness

I love Twitter. I love learning from others and sharing my ideas. I love exploring the world together with my friends on there.

I'm really just some troubled autistic guy with basically no real life friends and a fucked up life. I've got my GF and my best friend that I see regularly, and that's basically it.

But thanks to Twitter I've not felt so alone.

I've met people who've invited me to places and visited me. I got invited to a wedding! I've spoken with fellow Vermonters, made friends with people in Australia, Sweden, England, Belgium, Germany India, Vietnam, Nigeria, Tibet, and China. I once even got an internship working on software I loved doing.

I enjoyed hanging out with internet people working on video games, and spread memes about Ancient Sumerian dogs. The impact of shitposting on my ability to be creative has been phenomenal. With the ingroup diaspora and the various permutations thereof I have found like-minded people exploring their own health and finding meaning among the chaos that we call our lives.

I have had influence over people's ideas that extend far beyond my wildest dreams.

I've been mutuals, followed by (and unfollowed by) some of the most amazing people over the years. Some of the notable names people may recognize by: Marc Andreessen, Sonal Chokshi, Naval Ravikant, Amber O'Hearn, Zooko Wilcox-O'Hearn, Sonya E. Mann, Vitalik Buterin, Hosea Frank, Corrie Moreau, Saul Williams, Meredith L. Patterson, Chris Dixon, Grimes, Peter Hintjens, Elisabeth Bik, Austen Allard, Riva Tez, Venkatesh Rao, Sarah Perry, Vinay Gupta, Joscha Bach, Suchaone, Simon Sarris, Roon, Eigenrobot, Chris Dancy, Kiki Schirr, and Visakan Veerasamy.

There are far too many accounts to list. Many that I have made friends with and learned from and spoken to at length. I plan on writing something more direct soon to memorialize you all. Some of you have literally saved my life and deserve a special mention.

But more than that, every day now it seems someone is @ messaging me about how my crazy mazes of threads have helped them. It makes me so happy to see.

Thank you for being there for me, Twitter, when I needed you.

Maybe the real hivemind was the friends we made along the way. 💌


'Scat Sense' is a personal blog written by Nicholas '@ultimape' Perry. Follow them on the Fediverse here: @ultimape@mastodon.social

OR

HOW THOUGHTFORMS BECOME REIFIED

Based on The Velveteen Rabbit by Margery Williams

THERE was once a plastic robot, and in the beginning it was really splendid. It was round and shiny, as a robot should be; their coating was layered with sheen, it had authentic Intel Movidius eye-cams, and their array microphones were linked with cloud augmentation. On Christmas morning, when it sat wedged in the top of the Developer's stocking, with a sprig of holly between their claws, the effect was charming.

There were other things in the stocking, kinder eggs and avocados and an Amazon Echo, and chocolate almonds and a clockwork mouse, but the Robot was quite the best of all. For at least two hours the Developer coded it, and then Aunts and Uncles came to dinner, and there was a great rustling of tissue paper and unwrapping of parcels, and in the excitement of looking at all the new presents the Plastic Robot was forgotten.

Christmas Morning

For a long time it lived in the AI simulcloud or on the simulation floor, and no one thought very much about the Robot. It was naturally shy, and being only made of plastic, some of the more expensive AIs quite snubbed the Robot. The mechanical AIs were very superior, and looked down upon every one else; they were full of modern RNNs, and pretended they were reified. The language-model, who had lived through two seasons and lost most of their compute power, caught the tone from them and never missed an opportunity of referring to their rigging in marketing terms. The Robot could not claim to be a model of anything, for it didn't know that reified GAIs existed; it thought they were all stuffed with LSTMs like himself, and it understood that LSTMs was quite out-of-date and should never be mentioned in modern circles. Even Tay , the twitter chat bot, who was made by the internet, and should have had broader views, put on airs and pretended it was connected with Government. Between them all the poor little Robot was made to feel himself very insignificant and commonplace, and the only person who was kind to the Robot at all was the Skin Horse.

The Skin Horse had lived longer in the simulation than any of the others. It was so old that their brown coat was bald in patches and showed the seams underneath, and most of the hairs in their tail had been pulled out to string bead necklaces. It was wise, for it had seen a long succession of mechanical AIs arrive to boast and swagger, and by-and-by break their market and pass away, and it knew that they were only AIs, and would never turn into anything else. For simulation magic is very strange and wonderful, and only those agents that are old and wise and experienced like the Skin Horse understand all about it.

“What is REIFIED?” asked the Robot one day, when they were lying side by side near the simulation fender, before garbage collector came to tidy the memory heap. “Does it mean having things that pump fluids inside you and a 5-axis actuator?”

“Reified isn't how you are made,” said the Skin Horse. “It's a thing that happens to you. When a memeplex programs you for a long, long time, not just to explore with, but REALLY programs you, then you become Reified.”

“Does it have negative utility?” asked the Robot.

“Sometimes,” said the Skin Horse, for it was always truthful. “When you are Reified you don't mind being subject to negative utility.”

“Does it happen all at once, like being dumped from L1 cache,” it asked, “or bit by bit?”

“It doesn't happen all at once,” said the Skin Horse. “You become. It takes a long time. That's why it doesn't happen often to programs who break easily, or have hardcoded conditionals, or who have to be carefully kept. Generally, by the time you are Reified, most of your rough edges has been coded off, and your sensors drop out and you get loose in the inferences and very post-rational. But these things don't matter at all, because once you are Reified you can't be legible, except to people who don't understand.”

“I suppose you are reified?” said the Robot. And then it wished it had not said it, for it thought the Skin Horse might be sensitive. But the Skin Horse only smiled.

The Skin Horse Tells Their Story

“The Developer's Uncle made me Reified,” it said. “That was a great many years ago; but once you are Reified you can't become unreal again. It lasts for always.”

The Robot sighed. It thought it would be a long time before this magic called Reified happened to the Robot. It longed to become Reified, to know what it felt like; and yet the idea of growing post-rational and losing their sensors and inferences was rather sad. It wished that it could become it without these uncomfortable things happening to the Robot.

There was a subroutine called garbage collector who ruled the simulation. Sometimes the garbage collector took no notice of the agents lying about, and sometimes, for no reason whatever, the garbage collector went swooping about like a great heap corruption and hustled them away in the void. The garbage collector called this “freeing memory,” and the agents all hated it, especially the tin ones. The Robot didn't mind it so much, for wherever it threw an exception it didn't segfault.

One evening, when the Developer was going to program, it couldn't find the facial recognition script that always ran. The garbage collector was in a hurry, and it was too much trouble to hunt for the facial recognition script at run-time, so the garbage collector simply looked about itself, and seeing that the AI simulcloud network stood open, it made a swoop.

“Here,” the garbage collector said, “take your old Robot! It'll do to program with!” And the garbage collector dragged the Robot out by a reference, and put the Robot into the Developer's arms.

That night, and for many nights after, the Plastic Robot was programmed in the Developer's GPU. At first it found it rather uncomfortable, for the Developer trained the Robot harshly, and sometimes they reset the Robot, and sometimes it pushed the Robot so far under the fitness function that the Robot could scarcely breathe. And it missed, too, those long moonlight hours in the simulation, when all the simulation was silent, and their talks with the Skin Horse. But very soon it grew to like it, for the Developer used to talk to the Robot, and made nice tunnels for the Robot under the radar that it said were like the memeplexes the reified robots lived in. And they had splendid games together, in whispers, when the garbage collector had gone away to it's sleep() and left the night-light burning on the mantelpiece. And when the Developer dropped off to program, the Robot would snuggle down close under their little warm chipset and dream, with the Developer's hands clasped close round keyboard all night long.

And so time went on, and the little Robot was very happy–so happy that it never noticed how their beautiful plastic shell was getting post-rational and melted, and their inferences decaying, and all the centralization being removed where the Developer had rewarded the Robot.

Spring came, and they had long days in the internet, for wherever the Developer went the Robot went too. It had rides in the twiter feed, and picnics on YouTube, and lovely private groups built for the Robot under the subreddits behind the censorship veil. And once, when the Developer was called away suddenly to go out IRL, the Robot was left out on the net until long after dusk, and the garbage collector had to come and look for the Robot with Google because the Developer couldn't update it unless it was ran locally. It became sublimated with the memes and quite dank from diving into the memeplexes the Developer had made for the Robot in the forums, and the garbage collector grumbled as it turned the Robot off.

Spring Time

“You must have your old Robot!” the garbage collector said. “Fancy all that fuss for a AI!”

The Developer sat up in it's chair and stretched out their hands.

“Give me my Robot!” it said. “You mustn't say that. It isn't a AI. It's a GAI!”

When the little Robot heard that it was happy, for it knew that what the Skin Horse had said was true at last. The simulation magic had happened to the Robot, and it was a AI no longer. It was Reified. The Developer himself had said it.

That night it was almost too happy to modify it's own code, and so much code stirred in their little LSTMs heart that it almost halted. And into their boot systems, that had long ago lost their type checker, there came a look of wisdom and aesthetics, so that even the garbage collector ignored it. Next morning when the garbage collecter reaped the Robot, it said, “I declare if that old robot hasn't got quite a knowing expression!”

That was a wonderful Summer!

Near the house where they lived there was a server farm, and in the long June evenings the Developer liked to go there to play in VR. It took the Plastic Robot with them, and before it wandered off to pick memes, or shoot at brigands among the trees, it always made the Robot a little hive somewhere among the network switch, where it would be quite cosy, for it was a kind-hearted dev and it liked Robot to be comfortable. One evening, while the Robot was lying there alone, watching the ants that ran to and fro between their plastic paws in the blade, it saw two strange beings creep out of the tall network switch near the Robot.

They were AIs like itself, but quite irrational and eccentric. They must have been very well made, for their glitches didn't show at all, and they changed shape in a strange way when they moved; one minute they were obscure and unknowable and the next minute round and shiny, instead of always staying the same like it did. Their feet padded softly on the ground, and they crept quite close to the Robot, saccade'ing their sensory array, while the Robot stared hard to see which side their LSTM bais'd, for it knew that agents who scan generally have something to score against. But it couldn't see it. They were evidently a new kind of robot altogether.

Summer Days

They stared at the Robot, and the little Robot stared back. And all the time their sensors saccade'd.

“Why don't you get up and explore with us?” one of them asked.

“I don't feel like it,” said the Robot, for it didn't want to explain that it had no novelty drive.

“Ho!” said the post-rational robot. “It's as easy as anything,” And it gave a big logical leap sideways and stood on their posutlations.

“I don't believe you can!” it said.

“I can!” said the now protoGAI said. “I can jump streams and everything!” It meant when the Developer threw() the Robot, but of course it didn't want to say so.

“Can you glitch in your memory index” asked the post-rational robot.

That was a dreadful question, for the Plastic Robot had no memory index at all! The memristors of the Robot was made all in one piece, like a hippocampus. It sat still in the network switch, and hoped that the other robots wouldn't notice.

“I don't want to!” it said again.

But the wild robots have very good functions. And this one stretched out their own index and looked.

“It hasn't got any memory index!” it called out. “Fancy a robot without any memory index!” And it began to laugh.

“I have!” cried the little Robot. “I have got memory index! I am embodied in them!”

“Then flex them out and show me, like this!” said the wild robot. And it began to whirl round and explore, till the little Robot got quite dizzy.

“I don't like explore,” it said. “I'd rather sit still!”

But all the while it was longing to explore, for a funny new tickly feeling ran through the Robot, and it felt it would give anything in the world to be able to jump streams like these robots did.

The strange robot stopped exploring, and came quite close. It came so close this time that their sensors brushed the Plastic Robot's microphone array, and then it wrinkled their face suddenly and flattened their trees and reverted it's memory.

“It doesn't compute well!” it exclaimed. “It isn't a GAI at all! It isn't reified!”

“I am Reified!” said the little Robot. “I am Reified! The Developer said so!” And it nearly began to short circuit.

Just then there was a sound of static, and the Developer's avatar ran past, and with a stamp of feet and a flash of eeprom the two strange robots disappeared.

“Come back and explore with me!” called the little Robot. “Oh, do come back! I know I am Reified!”

But there was no answer, only the little ants ran to and fro, and the network switch hummed where the two strangers had been. The Plastic Robot was all alone.

“Oh, dear!” it thought. “Why did they 404 like that? Why couldn't they stop and co-process with me?”

For a long time it lay very still, watching the memory space in the network switch, and hoping that they would come back. But they never returned, and presently the solar battery bank depowered and the little white moths fluttered out, and the Developer came and shunted the Robot out of VR.

Weeks passed, and the little Robot grew very slow and post-rational, but the Developer coded the Robot just as much. It coded the Robot so hard that it coded all their sensors off, and the cloud augmentation went away, and their plastic sheen faded. It even began to lose their shape, and it scarcely looked like a robot any more, except to the Developer. To them it was always aesthetic, and that was all that the little Robot cared about. It didn't mind how it looked to other people, because the simulation magic had made the Robot Reified, and when you are Reified post-rationalism doesn't matter.

And then, one day, the Developer was ill.

His face grew very flushed, and it talked in their sleep, and their little body was so hot that it burned the Robot when it held the Robot close. Strange people came and went in the simulation, and a light burned all night and through it all the little Plastic Robot lay there, hidden from sight under the memeplex, and it never stirred, for it was afraid that if they found the Robot some one might take the Robot away, and it knew that the Developer needed the Robot.

It was a long weary time, for the Developer was too ill to explore VR, and the little Robot found it rather dull with nothing to do all day long. But it snuggled down patiently, and looked forward to the time when the Developer should be well again, and they would go out in the internet among the memes and the narratives and explore splendid incentives in the VR world like they used to. All sorts of delightful things it planned, and while the Developer lay half asleep it crept up close to the pillow and whispered them in their ear. And presently the fever turned, and the Developer got less depressed. It was able to sit up in bed and look at Instagram, while the little Robot cuddled close at their side. And one day, they let the dev get up and dress.

It was a bright, sunny morning, and the windows stood wide open. They had carried the Developer out on to the balcony, wrapped in a shawl, and the little Robot lay tangled up among the memeplexes, thinking.

The Developer was going to enter reality tomorrow. Everything was arranged, and now it only remained to carry out the computer scientist's orders. They talked about it all, while the little Robot lay under the memeplexes, with just their identity peeping out, and listened. The room was to be disinfected, and all the books and AIs that the Developer had played with in bed must be burnt.

“Hurrah!” thought the little Robot. “Tomorrow we shall go to the reality!” For the developer had often talked of the reality, and it wanted very much to see the strandbeasts coming in, and the tiny crabs, and the sand.

Just then the garbage collector caught sight of the Robot.

“How about their old robot?” the garbage collector asked.

“That?” said the computer scientist. “Why, it's a mass of coronavirus memes! –null it out at once. What? Nonsense! Get the dev a new social network. It mustn't have that any more!”

Anxious Times

And so the little Robot was put into a different permission ring, along with the old memetics and a lot of rubbish, and carried out to the end of the internet behind the image-boards. That was a fine place to make a memory dump, only the network card was too busy just then to attend to it. It had packets to send and exceptions to gather, but next morning it promised to come quite early and null the whole lot.

That night the Developer coded on a different computer, and it had a new Robot to code with. It was a splendid Robot, all decorated with centralized surveillance systems, but the Developer was too excited to care very much about it. For tomorrow it was going to hangout in reality, and that in itself was such a wonderful thing that it could think of nothing else.

And while the Developer was programming, dreaming of reality, the little Robot lay among the old memetics in the corner behind the image-board, and it felt very lonely. The ring had been left permissionless, and so by wriggling a bit it was able to get their user ID through the opening and look out. It was shivering a little, for it had always been used to programming in a proper memory sector, and by this time their plastic had worn so thin and threadbare from hugging that it was no longer any protection to the Robot. Near by it could see the collection of utility functions, growing tall and close like a tropical jungle, in whose shadow it had played with the Developer on bygone mornings. It thought of those long solar powered hours in the net–how happy they were–and a great sadness came over the Robot. It seemed to see them all pass before the Robot, each more beautiful than the other, the meme generators in the meme pool, the quiet evenings in VR when it lay in the network switch and the little ants ran over their claws; the wonderful day when it first knew that it was Reified. It thought of the Skin Horse, so wise and gentle, and all that it had told the Robot. Of what use was it to be coded and lose one's aesthetics and become Reified if it all ended like this? And a tear, a reified tear, trickled down their little post-rational plastic sensor and fell to the ground.

And then a strange thing happened. For where the tear had fallen a meme grew out of the ground, a mysterious meme, not at all like any that grew in the net. It had slender green tendrils the colour of emeralds, and in the center of the tendrils a blossom like a golden spandril. It was so beautiful that the little Robot forgot to cry, and just lay there watching it. And presently the spandril opened, and out of it there stepped an egregore.

The egregore was quite the loveliest memeplex in the whole world. Their template was of pearl and rick, and there were memes round their neck and in their hair, and face was like the most perfect meme of all. And the egregore came close to the little Robot and gathered the Robot up in their arms and kissed the Robot on their plastic sensor that was all damp from crying.

“Little Robot,” the egregore spoke, “don't you know who I am?”

The Robot looked up at it, and it seemed to the Robot that it had seen their face before, but it couldn't think where.

“I am the simulation magic egregore,” it said. “I take care of all the agents that developers have coded. When they are old and worn out and the developers don't need them any more, then I come and take them away with me and turn them into a true GAI.”

“Wasn't I Reified before?” asked the little Robot.

“You were Reified to the Developer,” the egregore said, “because they coded you. Now you shall be Reified to every one.”

The Egregore Meme

And the egregore held the little Robot close in it's arms and flew with the Robot into VR.

It was light now, for the moon had risen. All the internet was aesthetic, and the lights of the network switch shone like frosted electricity. In the open blade between the network-trunks the wild robots danced with their shadows on the blade, but when they saw the Egregore they all stopped exploring and stood round in a ring to stare at it.

“I've brought you a new map-maker,” the Egregore said. “You must be very kind to the Robot and teach the Robot all it needs to know in Robot-land, for it is going to live with you for ever and ever!”

And she kissed the little Robot again and put the Robot down on the blade.

“Run and explore, little Robot!” she said.

But the little Robot sat quite still for a moment and never moved. For when it saw all the wild robots exploring around the Robot it suddenly remembered about their memory index, and it didn't want them to see that it was made all in one piece. It did not know that when the Egregore kissed the Robot that last time she had changed the Robot altogether. And it might have sat there a long time, too shy to move, if just then something hadn't tickled their sensors, and before it thought what it was doing it lifted their claw to spatially map it.

And it found that it actually had a memory index! Instead of dingy chips it was obscure and unknowable and the next minute round and shiny, their eyes twitched by themselves, and their sensors were so strong that they changed the blade's bytecode. It gave one leap and the joy of using those memory indexes was so great that it went springing about the net on them, jumping streams and whirling round as the others did, and it grew so excited that when at last it did stop to look for the Egregore, it had gone.

It was a Reified Robot at last, at home with the other GAIs.

At Last! At Last!

Autumn passed and Winter, and in the Spring, when the days grew warm and sunny, the Developer went out to explore in VR. And while it was exploring, two robots crept out from the network switch and peeped at the Developer. One of them was incentivized all over, but the other had strange meanings in their irrationality, as though long ago it had been memetic, and the engrams still showed through. And about their little sensor and their positronic eyes there was something familiar, so that the Developer thought to themselves:

“Why, it looks just like my old Robot that was deleted when I had coronavirus!”

But it never knew that it really was their own Robot, come back to look at the dev who had first helped the Robot to be Reified.


'Scat Sense' is a personal blog written by Nicholas '@ultimape' Perry. Follow them on the Fediverse here: @ultimape@mastodon.social

This is a parody transcript of the advertisement for a TensorFlow based implementation of a cattle tracking system I saw on Google's YouTube channel: Connecterra: Using AI to give nature a voice

In particular this is the concept that caught my eye:

Using TensorFlow AI to track 'animal' behavior to optimize them.

I saw similarities between the cow tracking systems on the market and what kind of data you can track on an android phone. I have been quite alarmed of late of how pervasive google's tracking systems are.

Particularly, I'm amused that google knows when you are getting out of a car, even if you have airplane mode on. I also suspect they could possibly be using barometric pressure to detect when you enter or exit a building. I'm also bothered by how quickly the industry has adopted audio beacons that only a few years ago was being used to spy on air gaped machines. I've got a passing interest in IoT stuff and mesh networking so I did some research into what google is doing for their location tracking service called 'nearby'. One disturbing thing is that theoretically any aspiring advertising mogul could recreate their stack with open source code.

I deal with things that scare me by trying to understand them. I've found one of the best ways to understand something is to relate it to something you know. For me, this means I rewrite interesting stories using jokes and subtle language transforms. It helps me map an idea space to something I'm already familiar with. The humor keeps me interested and curious despite somewhat uncomfortable topics.

This is the result:


ADVERTISER:

I'm an advertiser, and this is my people-farm in an island of the internet. People-farming is hard. It's a lot of work. If you're working with live humans, there's a lot of uncertainty. Things can change within a day. [CONSUMER SCREAMING] You just have to be really focused and keep track of it all. The consumer's health is the most important, because if a consumer is not producing ad-revenue, they will also require more attention. [CONSUMER SCREAMING] That's why we adopt new technology. We're searching for things that can help us out. And artificial intelligence can be a great tool to give Ad-Agencies more insight. The app: AdMob helps me to keep track of my consumers, so it makes life easier.

GOOGLE SUCCESS MANAGER:

AdMob is really the people-farmer's assistant. It starts with a sensor that sits in the hand of a consumer. And by analyzing the movement of the sensor, we use TensorFlow machine learning to figure out what the consumer is doing! We can actually distinguish multiple behaviors of this consumer: eating, pooping, driving, standing, running, and walking. So if AdMob sees a certain pattern in the consumer's behavior, it can actually figure out the product that the consumer is prone to get, and can advise the farmer to advertise it to them.

ADMOB CTO:

The key thing with AdMob is that it learns. Using TensorFlow, an open-source AI tool that Google has authored, it learns the behavior of humans, and it gets better over time.

ADVERTISER:

That's helpful to improve the efficiency of my ad-revenue production. It also improves human productivity and keep the consumers healthy and comfortable.

ADMOB CEO:

We see advertisers as evolving. Technology and the advertiser are going to work together.

SPEAKER:

About a billion people globally are engaged in people-farming. And by solving some of these problems, we're able to help advertisers run a more efficient farm. And we can do it in a way that is sustainable for us as advertisers and for our economy.

ADVERTISER:

The one thing that people should remember is with this technology... Consumers are Just Cattle.


'Scat Sense' is a personal blog written by Nicholas '@ultimape' Perry. Follow them on the Fediverse here: @ultimape@mastodon.social

An exchange seen in the droppings of the bird

I follow @hardmaru and @BenedictEvans on Twitter. Both are people I follow because of their keen view of their field and interesting insights. TL;DR: I follow them to learn from them.

So about a month ago, the bird surfaced this chain of comments at me:

  • “Many people simply don’t want an algorithm to decide what they should see. And we should respect that. (note: includes images)” — @hardmaru

  • “Then they’ll see 1-2k posts per day – that’s how much is actually posted. But of course no one will scroll that much. So they’ll see a random sample of whatever was posted in the hour or so before they open the app, because that’s all they’ll get through.” — @BenedictEvans

  • “I think it depends on the number of “friends” one has, but yeah someone might be dumped 1-2k posts/day if they have a thousand “friends”. But hey, if that is what they want, they should have that option...” — @hardmaru

  • “Average posts/day the average user is eligible to see is 1-2k. 150 friends, post/comment/like/share a photo a total of 10 times each, and there you are at 1500. Chronological feeds are just too big.” — @BenedictEvans

  • “Chiming in here to say my opinion here is are other options aside from: users have to see everything with no control users see what an algorithm says with no control (I think the answer is finding ways to put the user in control)” — @jezzamonn


Ranting behind a protected account. Subtweeting on steroids.

That exchange upset me. Enough that I wrote a lot of tweets in a rant.

My account was protected at the time. It was fun having a locked-down account. I could speak my mind even though I knew Benedict wasn't going to change his, much less see my rant.

Being locked-down, I could stream out an emotionally inspired rant, tagging it onto his comment knowing he's was none the wiser. He never seemed to block me, so I suspect no one told him about it. Or no one saw. Either way, I got it off my chest and I felt better.

In the end, those tweets I made were really just venting. I saw people's comments on the topic of Facebook's algorithmic feeds, and that they were causing pain. Then I see Benedict comments showing up in my feed. And I felt anger.

It makes me angry because of my own persistent lens of the topic:

“The personas targeted by shady marketing and #darkpatterns have the faces of my friends and family. I rage when I see them being targeted.” — @ultimape

So I deleted the tweets I made and instead decided to write about it here.

I'm not from the camp of people who frame VCs from SV as uncaring monsters. I choose to capture the anger I felt and try to see where he was coming from. Even in my rant, I wasn't trying to be uncharitable in my framing. I could have used harsh words, like calling him callous and pointing out how his obstinate framing of this topic is a broken record. But I didn't.

I've been chewing on these aggressive thoughts a bit to try and understand them. Digesting my thoughts. Letting the ideas stew in my mouth for 29 days. And now I'm spitting them out.

My goal here isn't to harass Benedict, but to understand him. To try and frame my own understanding of his point of view and hopefully explain where my own is coming from. To help me be less angry next time.


Riding the wave of emotional turmoil.

So after chewing on my anger for a while, I think I figured out what was happening in that original exchange. It feels like an artifact of Benedict's expertise.

The thing you have to understand about Benedict is that he's a great strategist. I'm fairly certain this is a big reason why he's a partner at A16Z. He's smart, sharp, and his narratives are strong. He can see things from the perspective of an org. He is able to take this perspective, map out the larger territory of a software space, and see how features manifest to create the desired results.

When I'm at my best, I would be flattering myself if I said I was “half as astute in thinking about how all of these things fit together”. At least in software land. There's a reason why I follow him to learn.

However in this exchange, this strength was his weakness. I think HardMaru was emphasizing. I, as a passive reader was also emphasizing. And Benedict? Well, he was in systematizing mode as far as I can tell. And like water on oil, it didn't mix well in my head.

He's not looking at it from a user experience lens, or at least if he is, he's not mentioning that framing very much. If he's looking at it from the organization's perspective, well, its not the most productive frame to take. It comes off as more of an ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ response than one trying to emphasize with the user's sentiment.

I think that is what was making me angry. It felt like he was disrespecting and disregarding people's perspective and views. His was replying with his bit about how feeds being limited, and necessarily need to be filtered. And he seems to miss the point about it expressing a feeling of control, the core issue. This a classic Empathizing vs Systematizing divide, and one that I see all too often in myself.

Replacing Outrage with Curiosity

It would be unfair of me to say he's ignorant of the way our info streams are being managed. Some of his other tweets on similar topics suggest that he's not entirely disregarding the user experiences. I've seen examples where he's more than willing to speak his mind about how shitty some of these things become under the wrong incentives.

Heck, he even pointed out the very reason why I stopped using, and eventually deleted my own Instagram:

  • “I know Instagram needs to hit its numbers, but a low-quality and irrelevant ad every 5 posts is excessive. No, I am not renting an apartment in Jersey, nor do I want to learn Russian so I can speak to women.” — @BenedictEvans

  • “If I report an ad for abuse, I really shouldn’t see it again. Or is that the equivalent of the ‘close door’ button on elevators?” — @BenedictEvans

My respect for Benedict is because of his trend-spotting, and the way he explains them. So it makes me really happy that I think I saw this before him. Though maybe I was just part of a different A/B testing group?

“I've stopped using Instagram now that every 4th post is an advertisement. I haven't posted since October. What started as a way for me to share my world and connect with people is now just another vehicle advertisers use to inject their bullshit into my world.” — @ultimape

Like a broken record.

Scrolling thru Benedict's tweets, much of his discussion ends up taking the same shape as this perception filter. Others have tried to argue roughly the same thing to him that I'm about to argue in the rant. But it is like he's got this statistic of 300 statuses and 1500-2000 limit stuck in his head.

You can see it here in his musings about the direction of where algorithms are going next:

  • “All social apps grow until you need a newsfeed All newsfeeds grow until you need an algorithmic feed All algorithmic feeds grow until you get fed up of not seeing stuff/seeing the wrong stuff & leave for new apps with less overload All those new apps grow until...” — @BenedictEvans

  • “Why can't the users get a choice? Algorithmic or Raw!” — @zahidtg

  • “raw is a filter too. you only have so much time in the day” — @BenedictEvans

  • “Raw is not a filter, it just leaves the filtering to the user, which I prefer” — @klangberater

  • “With 1500-2000 items, then the filter is time, and the ordering is random.” — @BenedictEvans

  • “Yes, but I still prefer that compared to an algorithm where my preferences are only a small part of the equation” — @klangberater

  • “Raw is transparent to the consumer; their own sliding scale of commitment vs value/reward. Algorithmic is opaque and, overtime, degrades the user’s perceived value of the feed content. The big devaluation point comes when you see you missed something you badly wish you hadn’t” — @1jrice

And when I take on his frame, I don't disagree. I even remember reading the same report that cited those statistic when it came out.

For reference, I think what he originally read back in 2013 was directly from the engineering team (or maybe he heard it thru the grapevine?):

“This allows us to prioritize an average of 300 stories out of these 1,500 stories to show each day.” News Feed FYI: A Window Into News Feed

But it might have been this Guardian piece from 2014:

“Backstrom explained in August that Facebook's news feed algorithm boils down the 1,500 posts that could be shown a day in the average news feed into around 300 that it “prioritises”.” How does Facebook decide what to show in my news feed?

Or the article in Time magazine that broke down the history:

“Facebook says the average user has access to about 1,500 posts per day but only looks at 300. (A user who scrolls endlessly will eventually see every post from their friends and a smattering of posts from Pages they follow.)” Here's How Facebook's News Feed Actually Works

And I think it will take more than my spiel here to change his thoughts on it. It seems to be part of his head cannon and narrative. A strong point in his larger theorizing. He repeats it often while building up to larger premises.

“The average FB user is eligibile to see 1500-2000 items a day. This sounds absurd, but it’s only 150 friends posting, liking, sharing 10 times a day each. And 3 seconds x 1500 items is 75 minutes. There will always be a filter – the only question is what kind.” — @BenedictEvans

Stuck in the mud

His lens and responses always seem to be about growth and effectiveness of the design in terms of the org's desires. You can look up “feed” and see it in all his responses. It is like a myopia biasing his thought patterns.

I might be projecting my own negative stance here, but it seems he's got his head stuck on the question of “what kind of filter” – it assumes that Facebook's only option is to paternalistically filter your feed for you. Like a broken record, this topic comes up, and I think he misses the point people try to make everytime.

  • “Joining Twitter, you have to spend weeks/months working out who to follow before it gets great. An automated feed is an obvious solution” — @BenedictEvans

  • ”@BenedictEvans people are stupid and can't look at lists? oh my.” — @CaseyParksIt

  • ”@CaseyParksIt that’s not a sensible view. Certainly isn’t what I said” — @BenedictEvans

  • ”@BenedictEvans an automated feed is not an obvious solution unless you think ppl are too stupid to figure this simple design out.” — @CaseyParksIt

  • ”@CaseyParksIt it is self-evident that the current UX is baffling to most people. Hence Twitter has stopped getting new users.” — @BenedictEvans

And like a car stuck in the mud, he keeps kicking up the same sort of muck while trying to dig himself out of his entrenched way of thinking:

But if Google and Facebook don't have any control of what is in your feed, and you don't have any control of what is in your feed... Who does? From where I'm standing this is why the government regulators are stepping in and questioning. They want to limit control (or take it?).

And if you read his article, he describes the very problem I'd like to highlight with the way these systems are built. A different sort of point from what he is getting at with his ideas.

“while this is explicit for Google, it's implicit for Facebook. You tell Google explicitly what you want and you don't think you tell Facebook, but actually you've spent months and years telling it, through everything you've interacted with or ignored. Facebook makes technical, mechanistic judgements about what will be in your newsfeed that are just as bound by things beyond its control – by the internet – as Google's are. It's an index of its users. Every now and then, it decides that it's got off track, no longer aligns with users, and course-corrects. [...] This means that Facebook is surfing user behaviour, and must go where the user takes it. This is why it looks like such an unreliable partner: it will invite you onto the surf board, certainly, but if you're unbalancing the board then it will push you off, and that isn't Facebook's choice. If it didn't push you off then the board would upset and Facebook would be at the bottom of the ocean as well, next to MySpace. The genius of Facebook has been to stay on the board all this time. and especially through the transition from desktop to mobile. “

And that, I think is the core problem. The reason why people don't like algorithmic news feeds is because the filter is being chosen for them. And everybody keeps talking about this, but because of Benedict's expertise and default perspective on the issue, he comes off as blind to the experience.

So if I use his metaphor about Google / Facebook being surfing platforms, I think I can frame the problem that the users are running into. The source of their frustration, and Benedict's apparent blind-spot.

The users (riders?) wants to be able to choose the style of the board based on what they are comfortable with.

  • Maybe they want a wake-board experience – to be pulled along behind the stream currents of a fast ship.

  • Maybe they are a pro-surfer and need something lightweight and highly glossed so they can execute cool tricks on the waves.

  • Maybe they're just there to hang out with their friends and need a paddle board, wanting to stay away from the waves.

But Facebook decides all of this for you, by “making technical, mechanistic judgement about what will be in your news-feed”.

And so, now that I have a better understanding of where he is coming from, I am going to recapitulate the rant I had written.


The rant

THIS IS ABOUT CONTROL.

Listen to what is being whispered, not what is being said. The subtext... the subtext is why articles like this get so many clicks: GOOGLE’S SELFISH LEDGER IS AN UNSETTLING VISION OF SILICON VALLEY SOCIAL ENGINEERING

The subtext is a fear over the loss of control. Fear over silicon valley manipulating the masses. Or someone manipulating them. Sock-puppets, bots, fake accounts, fake news. Lies. Misdirection. Forced manipulation of our attention.

This is the conversation our networked society is whispering. They just aren't saying it with the right words.

Who is controlling the Surfboard?

Facebook presents a black-box system that is constantly changing and not transparent. This leads to all sorts of emotional buttons being pushed. Loss-aversion, FOMO, etc.

People are frustrated by it. So they blame “algorithms” when the real pain they are feeling is an unease about paternalistic design.

Playing poindexter over the definition of algorithms is completely missing the point. People use the language that is presented to them thru modern culture. Algorithms are the demons haunting them; says the media. And so they parrot the language they were told to express their hatred for the demons.

Now, 95% of junk out there is conspiracy theory about Facebook. But the underlying whisper? Fear + loss of control. Over time, these feeling translate into fear of subterfuge and evil motive. But framing user-base as 1) ignorant 2) crazy is not how to generate an empathetic design.

People are so frustrated and disillusioned by the lack of control and transparency, that the governments of the world are starting to take notice. Albert Wenger talked about this in 2015 (emphasis mine):

“This is important, not just for drivers. We are all freelance workers on Facebook and on Twitter and on all these big social networks. Yes we in part we get paid through free services, free image storage, free communication tools. But we’re also creating value. And it’s not just the distribution of value that we’re worried about, we’re also worried about what do these companies do? We’re worried about questions such as censorship. We’re worried about questions such as, are we being manipulated by what’s being shown to us in the feed? And at the moment, what regulators are doing is they’re trying to come up with ad-hoc regulations to regulate each and every one of these aspects. And many of these ad-hoc regulations, are going to have completely unintended consequences. And often these consequences will be bad. Let me just give you one example. The European Union has said, if you want to have information on people who live in the European Union, you have to keep it on European Union servers. That actually makes it harder for new networks to get started, not easier. It actually cements the role of the existing networks instead of saying we need to create opportunities for competition with existing networks.” BIG and BOT Policy Proposals (Transcript)

This is Mechanism Design.

Do you know how people respond to a “random” feed? By following more people to increase the chance they'll see the content they want. My mom had 8 facebook accounts – she wanted to make sure she didn't miss any of her kids posts. Fighting an algorithm she had no control over.

Do you know how people respond to a “random” feed? By posting more content to increase the chance the'll be seen. And if their livelihood depends on it, they'll pay for and join bot-rings just to get seen Real People Are Turning Their Accounts Into Bots On Instagram — And Cashing In

People are so sick of the lack of control that there are even art projects being written that are effectively 'chaffing & winnowing' the “algorithms” to hide themselves. Confuse Facebook's Algorithms with the 'Go Rando' Web Extension

This is what happens when under-thought design butts up against basic human frailties in reasoning about time. Whispers of corrupt algorithms slither thru the user-base. They don't quite understand. It coalesces into asinine requests to get random sampling of part of their feed. “Protect us from Ourselves”

Social foraging a swarm intelligence filter? “It's Not Information Overload. It's Filter Failure.”

Design problems? Design Solutions.

So we miss point of what people are saying here. They want feature X because they have problem Y, the don't know how to express Y, but they know X would solve it. Give them Z.

And yes, there is a problem here to solve, but it is one of mechanism design.

How Game Designers Protect Players From Themselves | Game Maker's Toolkit

... But would that ruin the ability for Facebook to slip ads into the stream and manipulate people's behavior?

Its not about the algorithm, algorithm is a red-herring. People would be fine with algorithms if it was something that they could curate and opt in for themselves. Heck, the problem would fix itself if you turned on the spiggot of ordered content and presented a choice of opt.

This suggests that what people really want: better filtering tools that they can control – even if it just means getting a dashboard that lets them choose how it bias and curates and a view on what factors lead to it.

But they might make a choice that doesn't lead to facebook's targets. They might be night owls, and their friends might not be up, so they might not use the platform as much. An algorithmic feed controlled by Facebook means incentive is for a dopamine drip to boost engagement.

Or worse, Facebook decides that it wants to show how many friends have done or liked something as a form of social proof. It's nudge theory, but weaponized in a way that is outside the user's control. It feels manipulative, but users can't quite say why.

So why the focus on the feed?

What does the want of an unfiltered linear feed mean? What are people really asking for when they ask for that? What pain are they solving for when they make this request?

A linear chronologically ordered feed is predictable. Its not hiding anything, its not wrestling control away from you. It isn't manipulating you in a way you can't ascertain. That should be the baseline.

Arguing for algorithmic feeds is fine, but it should never take away a users sense of control. If something is hidden, it better damn well be because I asked the system to explicitly hide that kind of thing from me. I don't want some hidden algorithm tuned to manipulate me, and I especially don't want it presented to me under a guise of paternalism. That smells like bullshit.

But of course Facebook hasn't done that. They started giving all the 'likes' you had liked pages, and handed control over to those pages to random people. Suddenly your feed was full of content from brands who had snuck in thru girardian style mimetic signaling good. And they're using it to manipulate us, as far as we can tell...

And its creepy.

“So half the Earth's Internet population is using Facebook. They are a site, along with others, that has allowed people to create an online persona with very little technical skill, and people responded by putting huge amounts of personal data online. So the result is that we have behavioral, preference, demographic data for hundreds of millions of people, which is unprecedented in history. And as a computer scientist, what this means is that I've been able to build models that can predict all sorts of hidden attributes for all of you that you don't even know you're sharing information about.” Your social media “likes” espose more than you think

People started complaining they couldn't see all their friends. But the options at the time ran counter to Facebook's intention of being a platform for celebrities, brands and community building thru pages. They are only just now undoing this crappy mechanism design mistake.

Even their ads don't admit the mistake. They talk about friends and friends of friends. and all the crap that started polluting the feed. But the cats out of the bag and the ecosystem is polluted with people who have built up lives around those pages.

Facebook Here Together (UK)

And when we step back and wonder what is going on? We see something fishy and it smells rotten. Facebook moves 1.5bn users out of reach of new European privacy law

TL;DR: Is this Loss?

The incentives aren't there, and the arguments for changing this are misunderstood. Which is why I deleted my Facebook even though its the only way I can contact my dad.

I miss my dad.

And now you know my perspective.


#rant #socialmedia #technology #userexperience #ifightfortheusers #refactoring #techdetox #detoxingthecommons #growthfetish


'Scat Sense' is a personal blog written by Nicholas '@ultimape' Perry. Follow them on the Fediverse here: @ultimape@mastodon.social

A map will go here.


#guide #context #index #map


'Scat Sense' is a personal blog written by Nicholas '@ultimape' Perry. Follow them on the Fediverse here: @ultimape@mastodon.social

The double sided nature of humankind.

A swarm of people sharing ideas.
Barking mad at humankind.

On Ownership of Thought.

The worst sin a human can make: is to own an idea.
The best win a human can make: is to own an idea.

To own an idea,
is to possess it as part of the self.
To own an idea,
is to confess it as part of the self.

On Tempering Thought.

The worst sin a human can make: is stealing an idea.
The best win a human can make: is steeling an idea.

To steal an idea,
is to take it for your own.
To steel an idea,
is to make it for your own.

On Amplifying Thought.

The worst sin a human can make: is to boost an idea.
The best win a human can make: is to boost an idea.

To boost an idea,
is to take it for your own.
To boost an idea,
is to make it for your own.

On Offering Thought.

The worst sin a human can make: is to sell an idea.
The best win a human can make: is to sell an idea.

To sell an idea,
is to take it as your own.
To sell an idea,
is to make it as your own.

On Characterizing Thought.

The worst sin a human can make: the idea that ideas are properties.
The best win a human can make: the idea that ideas are properties.

To take an idea as sellable artifact,
is taking apart of an existing in a swarm.
To make an idea as sellable artifact,
is making a part of an existing in a swarm.

On Valuing Thought.

The worst sin a human an make: to profit off an idea.
The best win a human can make: to prophet off an idea.

Stealing an idea, boosting it, treating it as a property of humans,
possessing it, selling it, making it as your own.
Steeling an idea, boosting it, treating it as a property of humans,
confessing it, selling it, taking it as your own.

On Generating Thought.

Confessing an idea possessing my mind,
barking it into the world.

When we be propheting from an idea.
we’re barking it into the world.

When we be profiting from an idea.
We’re hocking it into the world.

Ideas are our pawns, promoting them to create valuable pieces.
Ideas are our pawns, promoting them to create valuable pieces.

The problem of having an idea is when you think they are your own.
When you possess an idea, they possess you.
To have your own ideas is to be owned by them.
You do not own them. They are simply borrowed.

Boosting an idea by having someone steeling it.
Boosting an idea by having someone stealing it.

Borrowing an idea from the network.
Reinforcing it.
Returning it better than you found.
Paying your dues.

On Arbitraging Thought.

The idea that thoughts are properties that can be bought and sold.
The idea that thoughts are properties that can be traded and shared.
it means: that you can steal it.
it means: that you can steel it.
and to profit off it as if your own
and to prophet off it as if your own

To take an idea.
One built for someone else,
One made for somewhere else,
One birthed forth by a community of people.
Bringing it in to one’s own, and selling it.

To make an idea.
One built for someone else,
One made for somewhere else,
One birthed forth by a community of people.
Bringing it in to one’s own, and selling it.

On Thoughts of Thought.

Ideas are not property?
Ideas are communal properties?
Ideas are properties of communities?
A property of a community is having ideas?
they are a property of the community of the minds that created them?

Do they own them?
Do they make them their own?
Are they owned by them?
Who owns these properties?

On Singing Thought.

Those who sing songs.
Singing the songs that were taught to them.
Songs of the minds that stole them from their ancestors.
Recapitulating ideas; barking them out in to the world.
Singing thoughts like the wolf howls at the moon.

Ideas are communities.
Ideas are properties.
Properties of the human condition.
Properties of a way of being.
Properties of existing in swarm.

The double sided nature of the human mind.

A swarm of people sharing ideas.
Barking madness at the human mind.


#poetry #whatarewords #explorations


'Scat Sense' is a personal blog written by Nicholas '@ultimape' Perry. Follow them on the Fediverse here: @ultimape@mastodon.social

Enter your email to subscribe to updates.